Navigating Non-Conformities in Construction Industry Assessments

Navigating Non-Conformities in Construction Industry Assessments

In the construction industry, third-party assessments have become a standard practice. These assessments, conducted by organisations like ISO, Achilles UVDB, and CHAS, often reveal common non-conformities (NCs) that companies need to address. Let’s explore some typical NCs and their solutions.

1. Lack of Documented H&S Communication

Issue: Insufficient evidence of site communication between top management and employees.

Solution: Implement a central point register to record informal discussions, changes to RAMS, and issues raised by site employees. This helps identify trends and satisfies assessment requirements.

2. Subcontractor and Supplier Control

Issue: Inadequate management of subcontractor insurance, competency, and compliance with regulations like the Modern Day Slavery Act 2015.

Solution:
– Assign dedicated employees to manage subcontractor and supplier control.
– Establish clear requirements for documentation and competency.
– Set up regular checks for expiring records.
– Implement an audit program to ensure process effectiveness.

3. Non-Routine (Service) RAMS and Controls

Issue: Lack of risk assessments and method statements for non-site activities, often overlooked during assessments.

Solution: Extend existing HSEQ inspection programs to cover non-routine activities in offices, workshops, stores, and other non-site areas.

Key Takeaways

To prevent or address non-conformities:
1. Identify process owners
2. Maintain clear process records
3. Establish regular checking frequencies

By focusing on these areas, construction companies can improve their compliance and performance in third-party assessments, ultimately enhancing their overall safety and quality management systems.

Related Posts

Laptop dashboard showing an ISO audit year planned back from an assessment date, with team capacity, a progress gauge, a checklist, a hard hat and a calibration dial

ISO 9001 Resources: Why the Run-Up to Assessment Goes Wrong

ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 all ask you to decide what resources your management system needs and then provide them. When time and people are not set aside, the trouble shows up just before a Stage 1, Stage 2 or surveillance assessment. Here is what clause 7.1 requires and how construction SMEs avoid the crunch.

Read More